Year: 2003
Court: Pennsylvania Supreme Court
Case Number: No. 270 MAP 2003
Since the term “collapse” in the policy is ambiguous and connotes only a substantial impairment of a building’s structural integrity, there must be coverage for “imminent collapse” Court quotes UP’s brief.
This brief was written pro bono by John. N. Ellison, Esq. and Timothy P. Law, Esq. of Anderson, Kill & Olick.
The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.
Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/401-fourth-street-inc-vs-investors-insurance-group/
Date: November 22, 2024