Century Indemnity Co. V. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.

Year: 2025
Court: New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department
Case Number: 2024-00848

In its amicus brief, United Policyholders weighs in on one of the bedrock principles of insurance law, the doctrine of contra proferentem. Under the doctrine, ambiguous terms in insurance contracts are construed against the insurer. And the rationale is straightforward. Insurance companies write the policies and hold all the power relating to the specific wording in them. Specifically in its brief, United Policyholders argues against a “sophisticated insured” exception, which if allowed to stand would create a dangerous, hard to administrate, and unjustifiable exception under new York law.

Joshua Gold, William Passannante, and Jamie O’Neill of Anderson Kill P.C.

 


The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/century-indemnity-co-v-brooklyn-union-gas-co/
Date: June 28, 2026