Circle Block Partners et. al. v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co.

Year: 2021
Court: United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit
Case Number: 21-2459

In its brief, UP explores how an all-risk policy, like the one sold by FFIC, is meant to cover all risks of physical loss or damage that are not expressly excluded in the policy. Indiana law places the burden on insurance companies to clearly and unmistakably exclude any losses they want to exclude when issuing all risks policies.

UP argues that the COVID-19 pandemic is within the broad scope of the all-risk insurance policies and that virus and pandemic exclusions are at the industry’s disposal if the insurers do not wish to cover them. Under Indiana Supreme Court precedent, the existence of these exclusions shows (1) that the Insurance industry understands virus and pandemic losses were covered in the absence of any of these exclusions, and (2) that it was reasonable for policyholders to expect coverage if their policies did not contain any of these exclusions.

This brief was authored pro bono by Charles P. Edwards and Mark J. Crandley of Barnes & Thornburg LLP

 


The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/circle-block-partners-et-al-v-firemans-fund-ins-co/
Date: April 26, 2024