CSAA Insurance Exchange, etc. et al. v. Oscar Herrera

Year: 2019
Court: Supreme Court of California
Case Number: S256799

In its letter, UP argues that review is warranted in the above-named case. UP argues that future consideration and reliance on the CSAA opinion, particularly the “course of events” analysis, could deprive California policyholders of liability coverage for unintentional and accidental acts and conduct. The “course of events” analysis could be used to preclude coverage for any accident that was arguably preceded by intentional conduct. This case threatens to circumvent coverage analyses previously employed by this Court.

Amy Bach

 

The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/csaa-insurance-exchange-etc-et-al-v-oscar-herrera/
Date: November 26, 2024