Engalla, Nida vs. The Permanente Medical Group, Inc.

Year: 1995
Court: California Supreme Court
Case Number: SO48811

When a contract of adhesion such as in a medical plan, contains an arbitration clause, the judiciary should be able o review the arbitration systems to determine their fairness and neutrality.

UP’s brief was written pro bono by Deborah M. Mongan, Esq. of Anderson Kill Olick & Oshinsky. Of Counsel: Eugene R. Anderson, Esq., Bennett Ellenbogen, Esq. and Amy Bach, Esq.


The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/engalla-nida-vs-the-permanente-medical-group-inc/
Date: December 10, 2023