Evanston Insurance Company v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Orange

Year: 2025
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 25-3165

In its amicus brief, United Policyholders addresses whether an insurance policy that does not contain an aggregate limit should have an aggregate limit imposed by a court on the grounds that a general liability policy with only a per occurrence limit of liability, and no general aggregate limit, would be “inexplicable,” “unreasonable,” or “irrational.” United Policyholders argues that: it was in fact industry norm and intention to write policies in this way; and moreover, insurance companies should not be excused from their coverage obligations simply because, in hindsight, the covered losses are greater than the insurance company may have anticipated.

Nicholas Gellert, Stephanie Vancil De Oliveira, Michael Sharkey of Perkins Coie

 


The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/evanston-insurance-company-v-roman-catholic-bishop-of-orange/
Date: December 7, 2025