Gilbert Texas Construction, L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s London

Year: 2009
Court: Texas Supreme Court
Case Number: 08-0246

The Court held that the standard “contractual liability” exclusion found in the CGL policy essentially is a “breach of contract” exclusion applicable anytime a liability defense, e.g., statute of limitations or economic loss rule, eliminates a negligence cause of action, leaving only a breach of contract claim against the insured. In doing so, the Court more or less found that any time an insured enters into a contract with another party, the insured assumes liability in such contract, which places any breach of contract claim within the terms of the exclusion. In other words, the Court rejected the argument that the contractual liability exclusion requires the assumption of liability of another in the contract. This holding has huge ramifications as there are plenty of times when contracting parties are limited to contractual claims (e.g., economic loss rule). The Court, by its own admission, adopted the minority view.

UP’s brief was written pro bono by Micah Skidmore, Esq. of Haynes and Boone, LLP, Richard D. Milone, Esq. and Jennifer Best Vickers, Esq. of Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP and Amy Bach, Esq.


The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Date: December 9, 2023