Hinojos v. State Farm Lloyds and Pulido

Year: 2020
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Case Number: 08-16-00121-CV

In this brief UP endeavors to change the use of Texas’ longstanding reasonableness exception to bar insured’s Texas Prompt Payment of Claims Act (TPPCA) entitlements. This reasonableness exception provides insurers with a loophole opportunity to low-ball the insured, take a gamble on a policyholder paying for appraisal out of their own pocket, and pay the difference if they lose the appraisal without any further pecuniary consequence.

UP argues that:

  • TPPCA has no basis under Texas law;
  • The “reasonableness exception is problematic and continues to be in federal district court decisions”; and
  • The continued application of the reasonableness exception is not viable.

This brief was authored pro bono by Jeff Raizner, Andrew Slania, Ben Wickert of Raizner Slania LLP.

 


The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/hinojos-v-state-farm-lloyds-and-pulido/
Date: April 19, 2024