Year: 2004
Court: California Supreme Court
Case Number: S121723
The permissible ratio of punitive to compensatory damages after Campbell should not be limited to a bright line ratio.
UP’s brief was prepared pro bono by Andrew N. Chang of Enser & Chang, and Pillsbury & Levinson.
The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.
Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/johnson-greg-et-al-vs-ford-motor-company/
Date: April 20, 2024