Year: 2011
Court: Arizona Supreme Court
Case Number: CV-12-0180-PR
Should a jury verdict and Court of Appeals finding of clear and convincing evidence to support a punitive damages award result in a reduction of the award simply because it was in excess of a single digit ratio to compensatory damages?
This brief was written pro bono by Stanley G. Feldman and David L. Abney
The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.
Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/kenneth-john-nardelli-and-tammy-m-nardelli-v-metropolitan-group-property-and-casualty-insurance-company/
Date: November 26, 2024