Kent Farms, Inc. vs. Zurich Insurance Company

Year: 1998
Court: Washington State Supreme Court
Case Number: 67635-6

Insurance companies cannot abrogate their insurance policies by applying in practice a more restrictive interpretation of coverage than what was represented to the insurance commissioners in order to obtain approval of the language of the policy and associated premiums.

UP’s brief was written pro bono by John Hoglund, Esq. and John A. MacDonald, Esq. of Anderson Kill & Olick, PC. Of Counsel: Amy Bach, Esq.

 


The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/kent-farms-inc-vs-zurich-insurance-company/
Date: May 29, 2024