Old United Insurance Company, dba Vantage Casualty Company vs. Buhrman, Don

Year: 2005
Court: California Court of Appeal, 4th District, Division 2
Case Number: E039995

UP argued that the policy at issue contained a compulsory arbitration clause which Insurance Company ignored, forcing insured to incur expenses for litigation as well as loss of time. Under these circumstances, damages for breach of contract are insufficient. Only a tort rationale will provide compensation for the consequential damages suffered by the policyholder.

UP’s brief was written pro bono by Eugene R. Anderson, Esq., of Anderson, Kill & Olick, PC and Amy Bach, Esq.

 

The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/old-united-insurance-company-dba-vantage-casualty-company-vs-buhrman-don/
Date: April 26, 2024