Ortiz v. MeadWestvaco Corporation, et al v. JV Industrial Companies, Ltd., et al

Year: 2019
Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Case Number: 2019-C-01123

In its brief, UP argues that an insurance company must establish that the events leading to the outcome of an underlying case actually prejudiced the insurance company in a manner that would not have happened had the insurance company received timely notice of the claim. UP argues that: 1. Louisiana law requires proof of actual prejudice to avoid policyholder forfeiture and insurance company windfall; 2. The modern view of insurance requires proof of prejudice before insurers may avoid coverage on the grounds of late notice; 3. Legal and insurance coverage authorities across jurisdictions agree that this modern view requires that insurance companies prove actual prejudice, not theoretical prejudice; and 4. Louisiana law strongly disfavors forfeiture of insurance coverage.

This brief was drafted pro bono by G. Andrew Veazey of Veazey Felder & Renegar, LLC


The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/ortiz-v-meadwestvaco-corporation-et-al-v-jv-industrial-companies-ltd-et-al/
Date: April 16, 2024