Philip Morris USA vs. Mayola Williams

Year: 2005
Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Case Number: 05-1256

Review of Court’s previous decisions regarding punitive damages. The Court should not be setting substantive due process standards for punitive damage cases. Lower Courts have interpreted the Court’s opinion in Campbell V. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., as requiring a single digit ratio for the award of punitive damages. UP does not agree with this interpretation. UP takes that position that Campbell is unclear on this issue and before state courts automatically apply the single digit ratio, which is often in conflict with state law requirements for such as award, the Supreme Court of the United States must clarify its position.

UP’s brief was written pro bono by Arnold R. Levinson, Esq. and Amy Bach.

 


The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/philip-morris-usa-vs-mayola-williams/
Date: April 18, 2024