Pryce v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.

Year: 2026
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Case Number: 25-2994

In its amicus brief, United Policyholders filed an amicus brief supporting policyholders challenging Progressive’s practice of reducing no-fault wage-loss payments through statutory offsets while simultaneously counting the larger pre-offset amount toward exhausting policy limits. UP argued that this approach violates policyholders’ reasonable expectations and the insurer’s duty of good faith and fair dealing because insureds reasonably expect their coverage limits to be reduced only by benefits they actually receive.

Joshua Gold of Anderson Kill PC

 

The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/pryce-v-progressive-cas-ins-co/
Date: July 9, 2026