Qualcomm Inc. vs. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London

Year: 2007
Court: California Supreme Court
Case Number: S163293

Letter in Support of Petition for Review. UP took that the position that where a policyholder settles with a primary insurance for less than the full amount of the policy, the policyholder may still collect from its excess insurance company if a judgment is rendered or a settlement reached for more than the limit of the primary policy.

UP’s brief was written for United Policyholders pro bono by William G. Passannante of Anderson, Kill & Olick P.C. in New York, NY.


The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/qualcomm-inc-vs-certain-underwriters-at-lloyds-london/
Date: June 14, 2024