Year: 1995
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
Case Number: 95-55747, 95-56467
Lloyds of London should be judicially estopped from asserting inconsistent positions with regard to enforcement of forum selection and choice of law clauses.
UP’s brief was written pro bono by Eugene R. Anderson, Esq. and Seth B. Schafler of Anderson Kill Olick & Oshinsky, PC. Of Counsel: Amy R. Bach, Esq.
The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.
Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/richards-alan-vs-lloyds-of-london/
Date: April 25, 2024