Scottsdale Insurance Company vs. Essex Insurance Company

Year: 2001
Court: California Superior Court, Orange County
Case Number: 804650

Request for depublication. In construction defect litigation, the Court should not blindly enforce the condition-precedent language of the special subcontractor’s endorsement. If it does, extra-contractual considerations that are cited for enforcement of the endorsement will be ignored.

UP’s letter requesting depublication was written pro bono by Timothy C. Wilson of Aaron & Wilson LLP.

The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/scottsdale-insurance-company-vs-essex-insurance-company/
Date: April 25, 2024