Security Insurance Co of Hartford v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company

Year: 2001
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Case Number: AC 21960

Drafting history sanctions the policyholder’s right to designate which general liability insurance policies are liable to respond fully to a continuing injury. This is inconsistent with any “pro-rata” allocation among insurers.

UP’s brief was written pro bono by C. William Tanzi, Esq., Eugene R. Anderson, Esq., Mark Garbowski, Brian T. Valery (Law Clerk) of Anderson Kill & Olick, PC. Of Counsel: Amy Bach, Esq.

The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/security-insurance-co-of-hartford-v-lumbermens-mutual-casualty-company/
Date: April 25, 2024