Silver Sage Partners, Ltd. vs. City of Desert Hot Springs et al.

Year: 2002
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
Case Number: 02-57082, 03-55394

Where an insurer chooses to draft an exclusion that does not clearly and unambiguously apply to a specific claim, it cannot argue, after the fact, for a contrary interpretation. Poor draftsmanship cannot support an insurer’s argument for a narrow underwriting construction of coverage.

UP’s brief was written pro bono by Amy Bach. Esq. Of Counsel: Eugene R. Anderson, Esq. and John G. Nevius of Anderson Kill & Olick, PC

 

The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/silver-sage-partners-ltd-vs-city-of-desert-hot-springs-et-al/
Date: July 27, 2024