State Farm v. Amanali Babwari

Year: 2024
Court: 11th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Number: 24-11396

United Policyholders’ amicus brief addresses the consequence of an insurance company’s breach of the duty to defend. UP’s brief argues that State Farm should not be allowed to attempt to avoid paying for a consent judgment issued against its insured. State Farm initially defended its insured under a reservation of rights letter but then later decided to withdraw from the defense without obtaining a declaration that it had no duty to defend. When an insurance company engages in such behavior, it is bound by any reasonable underlying judgment or settlement both in terms of liability and damages.

Matthew Weaver and Timothy Law of Reed Smith LLP

 


The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/state-farm-v-amanali-babwari/
Date: June 13, 2026