Stein v. AXIS Insurance Company

Year: 2017
Court: California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division One
Case Number: B265069

In this letter requesting publication, UP urged publication because the decision addresses an issue of great importance to the insurance community, on which there is no published appellate decision, and no citable California decision: for purposes of standard form exclusions in director and officer (“D&O”) liability insurance policies that bar coverage for fraudulent or criminal acts only if a “final adjudication” of the insured’s misconduct has taken place, what is a “final adjudication”? In the decision, the Court carefully construed the “final adjudication” exclusion in the D&O policy at issue and, reading the exclusion in accordance with California’s established rules of insurance policy interpretation, concluded that a final adjudication does not take place until the conclusion of all proceedings in the underlying litigation, including appeals. As a result, the Court held, the insurer’s obligation to fund the insured’s defense continued through the appellate process. UPdate 4/6/17: The Court agreed to publish the opinion. See attached.

UP’s letter was authored pro bono by David B. Goodwin, Esq. of Covington and Burling LLP

 


The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/stein-v-axis-insurance-company/
Date: February 25, 2024