Year: 2008
Court: Supreme Court of Oregon
Case Number:
In order to assure that a punitive damages award fulfills the purpose of deterrence and retribution, due process considerations for assessing the constitutional validity of a punitive damages award must include consideration of the defendant’s wealth.
UP’s brief was written pro bono for United Policyholders by Sharon J. Arkin.
The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.
Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/strawn-mark-vs-farmers-insurance-company-of-oregon-mid-century-insurance-company-and-truck-insurance-exchange/
Date: April 25, 2024