The Oregon Clinic, PC v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company

Year: 2022
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 22-35047

In its amicus curiae brief, UP supports coverage for an insured’s business interruption losses related to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and COVID-19. UP argues that decades of case law demonstrate what the insurance industry and policyholders have long known: that “all risks” insurance policies protect insureds against a broad range of perils including noxious substances such as odors, fumes, ammonia, carbon monoxide, wildfire smoke, and viruses such as the one that causes COVID-19.

James Davis, Stephen Feldman, Bradley Dlatt of Perkins Coie

 


The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/the-oregon-clinic-pc-v-firemans-fund-insurance-company/
Date: August 16, 2022