Thomas Woodhams and Charlene Connors, v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Company

Year: 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
Case Number: 10-4389

Does Allstate’s 180 day policy language violate New York’s Standard Fire Policy? Is Allstate’s 180 day policy language ambiguous? UP argued that it is not reasonable to uphold language in property policies that deprives insureds of full replacement cost benefits where they cannot complete repairs/replacement within 180 days of a loss.

UP amicus brief written pro bono by Marc Ladd in the NY office of Anderson Kill and Olick.

 

The information presented in this publication is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue or problem, United Policyholders recommends that you consult with an attorney. Guidance on hiring professional help can be found in the “Find Help” section of www.uphelp.org. United Policyholders does not sell insurance or certify, endorse or warrant any of the insurance products, vendors, or professionals identified on our website.

Source: https://uphelp.org/amicus-briefs/thomas-woodhams-and-charlene-connors-v-allstate-fire-and-casualty-company/
Date: April 19, 2024