Delgado vs. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern California
Year 2007
Court California Supreme Court
Case Number S155129
Issue
  • Duty to Defend
State
  • California

This case concerns the proper scope of an insurer’s duty to defend its insured in circumstances indicating that the insured may have acted in self-defense. United Policyholders takes the position that whenever the lawsuit contains factual allegations or extrinsic evidence from which the insurer can infer that the insured may have acted under the apprehension, even if erroneous, that he or she may be in danger, the insurer has a duty to defend.

Related Docs
Author UP's brief was written pro bono by Kirk A. Pasich, Sandra S. Franklin and Stephanie A. Sullins of Dickstein Shapiro LLP
Related Cases
Aloha Petroleum v. National Union Fire Insurance Company
Year: 2024
Court: Hawaii Supreme Court
Case Number: SCCQ-23-0000515
Issue:
  • Duty to Defend
State:
  • Hawaii

In the Aloha Petroleum case, the Hawaii Supreme Court accepted a certified question from a Hawaii Federal District Court asking: (1) For any insurance policy defining a covered “occurrence” in part as an “accident,” can an “accident” include recklessness? and (2) For an “occurrence” insurance…
Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Medline Industries, Inc. et al.
Year: 2023
Court: Appellate Court of Illinois, First Judicial District
Case Number: 1-23-0841
Issue:
  • Duty to Defend
State:
  • Illinois

In its amicus curiae brief, United Policyholders addresses the question of whether a liability insurer has a duty to defend an underlying lawsuit alleging only willful and intentional wrongdoing by an insured defendant but when liability could be established by proof of non-intentional, accidental conduct. Drawing…
Travelers Insurance Company, et al. v. Bodell Construction Company
Year: 2023
Court: Hawaii Supreme Court
Case Number: SCCQ-22-0000658
Issue:
  • Duty to Defend
State:
  • Hawaii

In its amicus brief, United Policyholders addresses a critical question that has split state high courts around the country: whether an insurance company can seek reimbursement or recoupment of previously paid defense fees and costs when the insurance policy contains no express provision allowing for…
QBE Insurance Corporation v. The Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada and Lamplight Village @ Centennial Springs Homeowners Association
Year: 2022
Court: Nevada Supreme Court
Case Number: 84181
Issue:
  • Duty to Defend
State:
  • Nevada

In its amicus curiae brief, United Policyholders addresses the special and ongoing obligations imposed on an insurance company that has undertaken the legal defense of its insured in an underlying tort lawsuit.