QBE Insurance Corporation v. The Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada and Lamplight Village @ Centennial Springs Homeowners Association Year: 2022 Court: Nevada Supreme Court Case Number: 84181 Issue: Duty to Defend State: Nevada In its amicus curiae brief, United Policyholders addresses the special and ongoing obligations imposed on an insurance company that has undertaken the legal defense of its insured in an underlying tort lawsuit.
Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Co. v. The Eighth Judicial District and JGB Vegas Retail Lessee Year: 2022 Court: Nevada Supreme Court Case Number: 84986 Issue: COVID-19 State: Nevada In its amicus curiae brief, UP supports coverage for an insured’s business interruption losses related to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and COVID-19. UP argues that decades of case law demonstrate what the insurance industry and policyholders have long known: that “all risks” insurance policies protect insureds…
Circus Circus v. AIG Specialty Ins. Co. Year: 2021 Court: United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit Case Number: 21-15367 Issue: COVID-19 State: Nevada In its brief, UP weighs in on the tumultuous effect the pandemic has inflicted on the entertainment industry, namely a hotel/ casino in the entertainment capital of the world. Apart from, but complimentary to, the argument of the policyholder that the presence of COVID-19 at the insured…
Merrick vs. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, et al Year: 2008 Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Case Number: 08-17742 Issue: Punitive damage award that only slap an insurer on the wrist will fail to deter reprehensible behavior. State: Nevada In situations where insurers ignore the law and abandon the principles of good faith and fair dealing in a persistent manner, meaningful punitive damage awards are justified to temper the behavior of a member of this quasi-public industry. A punitive damage award must be sufficient…
Loyal Crownover vs. Traveler’s Casualty & Surety Year: 2002 Court: Nevada Supreme Court Case Number: Docket No. 40234 Issue: Exclusions State: Nevada Exclusions in a policy cannot be buried in the boilerplate verbiage of the grant of coverage. In this policy the promise of a defense under these circumstances was clear and invoked the insurer’s duty to defend.
James Nalder v. United Automobile Ins. Co. Year: 2016 Court: Nevada Supreme Court Case Number: 70504 Issue: Duty to Defend State: Nevada Under contract principles, a party that breaches a duty owed under a contract is liable for losses consequential for that breach when there is a special circumstance present. Contracts of insurance present a special circumstance given the special relationship between the parties and nature of…