Rohm and Haas Company vs. Continental Casualty Company
Year 1998
Court Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Eastern District
Case Number 00670PHL98 & 00671PHL98
  • "Known loss" standard vs. proof of fraud in application
  • Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania should require proof of fraud on an application for insurance by clear and convincing evidence and should not adopt a “known loss” standard which drastically lowers the insurer’s burden.

Related Docs