UP answered my previous question regarding the insurance’s estimate of 1,533 SF versus what we thought it was (1,850 SF) and what we should do. One suggestion was to find out how the insurance company determined their square footage. We have a 2-story house. They supplied us with a SF floor plan based on a sketch I sent them. I determined they used the INSIDE MEASUREMENTS when they gave me the scope of loss calculations (which low-balled the estimate). They did include the outside stucco, painting, and gutters. When we take their “floor plan” and measure the OUTSIDE SF, it is over 1,800 square feet.
So my question is: are they correct?
When you say cost per SF, is it based on inside SF or outside SF, or does it matter as long as you include the cost of the outside repair of the house?
For example:
$729,000 ÷ 1,533 SF = $475 per square foot
$729,000 ÷ 1,800 SF = $405 per square foot
Does this really matter (other than for the foundation)? Do we just need a realistic scope of loss?