Hi Joanna,
Since you’re taking a closer look at your policies, I’m sharing some additional thoughts beyond what you specifically asked because they are important and also very valid.
The Oakland/Bay Area is one of the most expensive regions in California to rebuild. As a reminder, CEA policies do not include extended replacement cost coverage, so it would be wise for them to revisit their limits to ensure they’re adequate.
A few years ago, the CEA’s financial strength rating was downgraded to B++. There are other A-rated earthquake markets available, and I’d encourage them to work with their broker to obtain comparison quotes. This is especially relevant given that many homes in Oakland are older, and some of those alternative carriers offer stronger building ordinance or “code upgrade” coverage that could be valuable.
Lastly, while funds from a CEA claim can typically be used to rebuild elsewhere if there is no mortgage, the situation changes when a lender is involved. In that case, the mortgage company has a rightful claim on insurance proceeds. Customers could still decide to move rather than rebuild, but some or all of the payout may first need to be applied to satisfy the loan.
Best,
Amir Filsoof