In its amicus curiae brief, United Policyholders advocates explicitly overturning Indiana’s overbroad “neutral stance” rule formulated in the case Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company v. Statesman Insurance Company, which declines to extend the benefit of the longstanding contra proferentem rule to parties who have not directly paid insurance premiums.
Harsco Corporation v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
Year
2023
Court
Indiana Supreme Court
Case Number
21A-PL-02483
Issue
- Contract Interpretation - Ambiguity
State
- Indiana