Allianz Global Risks U.S. Ins. Co., Allianz Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Ace Property and Casualty Ins. Co. et al
Year 2016
Court Oregon Supreme Court
Case Number A159858
Issue
  • Contract Interpretation
State
  • Oregon

In an insurer v. insurer coverage battle, UP and co-amici urged an interpretation favorable to the policyholder of a coverage provision which does not require “seepage, pollution or contamination” resulting from a “sudden, unintended and unexpected happening” during the policy period to be “abrupt” or “instantaneous” for coverage to exist.

Related Docs
Author UP is represented by Seth H. Row of Miller Nash Graham and Dunn
Related Cases
Peoples Insurance Counsel Division v. State Farm
Year: 2014
Court: Maryland Court of Appeals
Case Number: 21 - September Term 2014
Issue:
  • Contract Interpretation
State:
  • Maryland

Maryland law does not apply the rule of contra proferentem, accepted by a majority of states – that ambiguous terms in insurance contracts are to be construed strictly against the insurer-drafter; instead, Maryland law treats an insurance contract like any other contract, drafted by parties…
Pistorese v. Transamerica Life Insurance Company
Year: 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
Case Number: 14-35027
Issue:
  • Contract Interpretation
  • Long Term Care Insurance
State:
  • Washington

Under Washington law, insurance contracts are to be interpreted based on the principle of contra preferentem – ambigious terms must be strictly construed against the drafter-insurer and in favor of the insured as to effectuate coverage. UP argued in its brief, that in the long-term-care…
Thomson, Inc. et al. v. XL Insurance, Inc. et al.
Year: 2014
Court: Indiana Supreme Court
Case Number: 49A05-1109-PL-470
Issue:
  • Allocation
  • Contract Interpretation
State:
  • Indiana

On appeal from a decision in error by the Indiana Court of Appeal, UP argued in its brief that the presumptive rule in determining the scope of coverage under a Commercial General Liability Policy (“CGL”) should be “all-sums” or joint and several liability. For “long-tail”…
Demetrio v. Stewart Title Insurance
Year: 2015
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Case Number: 2010/101760
Issue:
  • Contract Interpretation
State:
  • New York

A court faced with textual ambiguity may review extrinsic evidence to assist the trier of fact in ascertaining what the parties intended in entering into the contract. UP argued in its brief that an insurance company ought not to be able argue to the court,…