Dana Corp. vs. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co., et al. Year 1996 Court Indiana Court of Appeals Case Number 17171-6-II Issue Coverage State Indiana Related Docs Related Cases 401 Fourth Street Inc. vs. Investors Insurance Group Year: 2003 Court: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case Number: No. 270 MAP 2003 Issue: Coverage State: Pennsylvania Since the term “collapse” in the policy is ambiguous and connotes only a substantial impairment of a building’s structural integrity, there must be coverage for “imminent collapse” Court quotes UP’s brief. Dana Corp. vs. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co., et al. Year: 1996 Court: Indiana Court of Appeals Case Number: 17171-6-II Issue: Coverage State: Indiana County of San Diego v. Cigna Property and Casualty Company Year: 2002 Court: California Court of Appeal, 4th District, Division 1 Case Number: D038707 Issue: Coverage State: California Duty of insurance company to cover claims not specifically addressed by court. Companion case to Ace Property. Fairfield Insurance Co. vs. Stephens Martin Paving Year: 2003 Court: Texas Supreme Court Case Number: RP 04-0728 Issue: Coverage State: Texas The “all sums” language in a liability policy of insurance should be construed to provide coverage for gross negligence and punitive damages.