Volunteer Board of Directors should be covered under D & O policy and the Court should not so broadly construe the exclusion for breach of contract so as to apply to tort claims because the lawsuit remotely related to the corporation’s breach of its bond obligations. Moreover, the burden of proof to disprove the application of the breach of contract exclusion, simply because the exclusion was hidden in the definition of a term contained in the insuring clause of the policy. California Courts have always held that the insurer bears the burden to prove that an exclusion precludes coverage.
Medill vs. Westport Insurance Corporation
Court California Supreme Court
Case Number Second District Case Nos: B17007 & B182442
- D & O Liability