Norfolk Southern et al v. California Union Insurance Co.
Year: 2001
Court: Louisiana First Circuit Court of Appeal
Case Number: 2002-CA-371
Issue:
  • Allocation
  • Joint and Several Liability
State:
  • Louisiana

The Court should affirm its decision to allow joint and several liability where the loss may be covered by several insurance policies and not allow the insurer’s pro-rata allocation scheme which puts the burden on insureds.
Nieto, Julie vs. Blue Shield of California Life & Health Insurance Company
Year: 2009
Court: California Supreme Court
Case Number: B214669
Issue:
  • Post Claims Underwriting
State:
  • California

If the Court of Appeal decision cannot be reconciled with California public policy and is inconsistent with all other California authority, which has strongly condemned unlawful post claims underwriting.
Neil, Jonathan & Associates vs. Jones et al.
Year: 2002
Court:
Case Number:
Issue:
  • Tort Damages
State:
  • California

Request for Depublication. Court held that the plaintiff could not state a cause of action for bad faith for the failure to settle claims against him because the conduct in question did not involve the payment of claims by the insured or the failure to…
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company vs. Chillura
Year: 2004
Court: Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal
Case Number: 2D04-4906
Issue:
  • Property insurance--foundation integral part of building.
State:
  • Florida

A building’s foundation system is an integral component of any building. Accordingly, declaring a foundation system part of the “land” and not part of the building in order to deny coverage is misconstruing and misapplying both Florida Statute No.627.706 and related insurance policy provisions. In…
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Richardson
Year: 2002
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Case Number: 01-SP-1451
Issue:
  • Pollution Exclusion and Coverages
State:
  • District of Columbia

Court should consider the historical circumstances surrounding the drafting of the Absolute Pollution Exclusion (APE) and limit its application to long-term industrial pollution of the environment and should not allow insurance companies to apply the APE to cases that do not involve environmental pollution. UP…
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh vs. Crocker, Beatrice
Year: 2005
Court: Texas Supreme Court
Case Number: 06-0868
Issue:
  • Coverage
State:
  • Texas

The Court should confirm the well-established rule that insurance companies owe their policyholders and additional insureds a duty to disclose coverage. Moreover, an insurance company cannot rely on lack of formal notice when it (a) receives actual notice or (b) has not been prejudiced by…
Motiva Enterprises, LLC vs. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
Year: 2004
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit
Case Number: 05-20139
Issue:
  • No forfeit of coverage for settline without insurance company's authority.
State:
  • Texas

The insured should not forfeit coverage by settling without insurance company’s authority when the insurance company intentionally places itself in an adversarial position with its insured by issuing a Reservation of Rights.
Morris, Martin vs. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company
Year: 2002
Court: California Court of Appeal, 4th District
Case Number: G030567
Issue:
  • Bad Faith
State:
  • California

Request for depublication of opinion which held that bad faith liability cannot be imposed upon an insurer as a matter of law where there are uncertainties in controlling case law even if the insurer is wrong on the law.
Morrill and The Estate of John Prestiss vs. Cotton States Mutual Insurance Company
Year: 2007
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Case Number: A08A1391
Issue:
  • Statute of Limitations
State:
  • Georgia

Insurer attempted to apply contractual one year statute of limitations in contravention of the public policy of Georgia, as established by statute and precedent allowing policyholders two years from the date of loss to file suit. The trial court erred by (1) applying the time…
Monticello Insurance Company v. Baecher
Year: 1995
Court: Virginia Supreme Court
Case Number: 960193
Issue:
  • Trigger of Coverage
State:
  • Virginia

UP’s (and co-amici’s) brief was written pro bono by Irene C. Warshauer, Esq., Joan L. Lewis, Esq., Todd D. Robichaud, Esq. of Anderson Kill & Olick, PC, and Robert L. Carter, Esq. of McKenna & Cuneo, LLP
Millers Capital Insurance Company vs. Gambone Brothers Development Co., et al.
Year: 2006
Court: Pennsylvania Superior Court
Case Number: Docket No. 420 EDA 2007
Issue:
  • Coverage
State:
  • Pennsylvania

Case involves insurance coverage for property damage resulting from faulty workmanship by an insured contractor and its subcontractors. The standard form general insurance liability policy (“CGL”) was intentionally designed to cover the underlying claims of faulty workmanship.
Meyer vs. Sprint Spectrum L.P.
Year: 2008
Court: California Supreme Court
Case Number: S153846
Issue:
  • Consumers Legal Remedies Act should include insurance
State:
  • California

Petition for Rehearing urging the Court to revisit its decision holding that the Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Civil Code section 1770 e seg (“CLRA”) does not authorize peremptory challenges to provisions in an agreement to foreclose the public civil justice system (e.g., through arbitration) and…
Metz, John v. Superior Court of California
Year: 2003
Court: California Court of Appeal, 2nd District
Case Number: B175073
Issue:
  • Relief under insurance code 1871.7; Deputize private citizens
State:
  • California

UP supports relief under section 1871.7 which deputizes private citizens to act on behalf of the state claiming that Farmers Insurance Co. makes misrepresentations in its handling of private passenger vehicle physical damage claims and in the sale and marketing of its private passenger vehicle…
Rohm and Haas Company vs. Continental Casualty Company
Year: 1998
Court: Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Eastern District
Case Number: 00670PHL98 & 00671PHL98
Issue:
  • "Known loss" standard vs. proof of fraud in application
State:
  • Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania should require proof of fraud on an application for insurance by clear and convincing evidence and should not adopt a “known loss” standard which drastically lowers the insurer’s burden.
Rocky Cola Café vs. Golden Eagle
Year: 2002
Court: California Supreme Court
Case Number: S117935
Issue:
  • Duty to Defend
State:
  • California

There is no authority for an insurer who provides a litigation defense to seek TOTAL reimbursement of all funds on grounds that it never had a duty to defend in the first place.
Richards, Alan vs. Lloyds of London
Year: 1995
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
Case Number: 95-55747, 95-56467
Issue:
  • Choice of Law
  • Forum selection
State:
  • California

Lloyds of London should be judicially estopped from asserting inconsistent positions with regard to enforcement of forum selection and choice of law clauses.
Ravindran vs. Harleysville Insurance Company
Year: 2002
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Case Number:
Issue:
  • Bad Faith
State:
  • Pennsylvania

Tutorial to court re: utmost good faith; bad faith; arbitration
Radian Guaranty Insurance vs. Respondents
Year: 2002
Court: California Insurance Commission
Case Number: SF 15404-A, OAH No. N2002070670
Issue:
  • Title Insurance
State:
  • California

UP supports DOI ruling that two companies that do not meet California criteria for title insurers to cease and desist from transacting title insurance.