Sapa Extrusions, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
Year 2018
Court United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Number 18-2206
Issue
  • Duty to Defend
  • Insurance contract interpretation
  • policyholder reasonable expectations
State
  • Pennsylvania

In its brief, UP focuses on three grounds for reversal of the district court opinion: The District Court failed to interpret the insurance policies as a whole and rendered products liability coverage illusory in Pennsylvania. The District Court’s interpretation of “occurence” contravenes the insured’s reasonable expectations. The underlying complaint contains allegations of damage to other property caused by a product defect, triggering the dutiy to defend. UPdate: Pennsylvania policyholders received a favorable decision in this case, attached below.

Related Docs
Author UP's brief was authored pro bono by John G. Koch, Esq., Weisbrod Matteis & Copley PLLC
Related Cases
Aloha Petroleum v. National Union Fire Insurance Company
Year: 2024
Court: Hawaii Supreme Court
Case Number: SCCQ-23-0000515
Issue:
  • Duty to Defend
State:
  • Hawaii

In the Aloha Petroleum case, the Hawaii Supreme Court accepted a certified question from a Hawaii Federal District Court asking: (1) For any insurance policy defining a covered “occurrence” in part as an “accident,” can an “accident” include recklessness? and (2) For an “occurrence” insurance…
Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Medline Industries, Inc. et al.
Year: 2023
Court: Appellate Court of Illinois, First Judicial District
Case Number: 1-23-0841
Issue:
  • Duty to Defend
State:
  • Illinois

In its amicus curiae brief, United Policyholders addresses the question of whether a liability insurer has a duty to defend an underlying lawsuit alleging only willful and intentional wrongdoing by an insured defendant but when liability could be established by proof of non-intentional, accidental conduct. Drawing…
Zurich American Insurance Company v. Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
Year: 2023
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Case Number: 23-1167 & SJC-13535
Issue:
  • Insurance contract interpretation
State:
  • Massachusetts

In its amicus curiae brief, United Policyholders addresses the question of whether rainwater that landed and accumulated on an enclosed rooftop one or more stories above ground constitutes “surface waters” for the purposes of an insurance policy’s “Flood” sublimit. Related News A “Flood” of Uncertainty;…
Travelers Insurance Company, et al. v. Bodell Construction Company
Year: 2023
Court: Hawaii Supreme Court
Case Number: SCCQ-22-0000658
Issue:
  • Duty to Defend
State:
  • Hawaii

In its amicus brief, United Policyholders addresses a critical question that has split state high courts around the country: whether an insurance company can seek reimbursement or recoupment of previously paid defense fees and costs when the insurance policy contains no express provision allowing for…