United Policyholders’ amicus brief addresses the consequence of an insurance company’s breach of the duty to defend. UP’s brief argues that State Farm should not be allowed to attempt to avoid paying for a consent judgment issued against its insured. State Farm initially defended its insured under a reservation of rights letter but then later decided to withdraw from the defense without obtaining a declaration that it had no duty to defend. When an insurance company engages in such behavior, it is bound by any reasonable underlying judgment or settlement both in terms of liability and damages.
State Farm v. Amanali Babwari
Year
2024
Court
11th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Number
24-11396
Issue
- Duty to Defend
State
- Alabama
Matthew Weaver and Timothy Law of Reed Smith LLP